According to me this is the major bug: http://www.seeedstudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=2217&
I’d appreciate to know the opinion of seeedstudio developers about it.
Thanks and regards.
According to me this is the major bug: http://www.seeedstudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=2217&
I’d appreciate to know the opinion of seeedstudio developers about it.
Thanks and regards.
When will the bug viewtopic.php?f=22&t=2217&
be fixed in an official version?
Where can I find the version of Chip for download?
The Chip version was at the link i posted before (viewtopic.php?f=22&t=1929&start=110) at bottom of the page, but it seems has been removed (“Last edited by chip on Thu Nov 03”).
I expected that the reason for the removal was to include it (or at the least the bugs fixed there) in the official release of 2011/11/15, but i have tried it and i didn’t find the good stuff of the Chip’s one…and off course i rolled back to the Chip’s one.
Could you post Chips version here? Without this bugfix the DSO Quad is not usable as a DSO.
Thank you. I installed it and saw the DSO working propertly the first time at all!
first of all i really would like to see the variable duty cycle in the signal generator
secondly i also suggest a x-y plot of channel A vs B and vice versa rather than always the channel vs time since it is very useful for some circuitry
I wish to have a low speed signal recorder function for making battery discharge voltagedrop tests.
Battery discharge test take several hours.
The current 1s/div is far too fast for this kind of testing.
Then I need to take a bitmap of the displayed waveform.
At the time I am using Marco’s 1.8 version.
This should be rather easy to implement for everybody with a minimal experience in software engineering.
I suggest you have a look at Petteri Aimonen’s page essentialscrap.com/dsoquad/freq.html, his “frequence response application” is an excellent starting point and very well commented. His instructions about how to install a freeware development environment on Windows are easy and they work (not like others here…).
Regards
Patrick
i m watching the sources of DSO_gcc_v7.1 and have different questions…after 2 min of watching.
why do you still poll in timer handler the keyboard state(keys pressed), and don’t have keyboard interrupt, as any good hardware? what a strange idea - permanently poll rare events, if interrupts make it easy and in proper way.
Hi! I need help.
My device gives out the wrong form of a signal on the channel “A”. I repeatedly changed an firmware, the result on all is identical. I understand that malfunction is not in the program, and in the hardware. I ask to prompt to me, what details on a payment can be faulty?
I changed the probes, it didn’t solve a problem.
On a screenshot both channels (A and B) are connected to the same signal, only shifted for the period
I assume your input signal is square wave. Try adjusting the trimmers behind the battery - it may help. Looks like too much reactance compensation on Ch A and too little compensation for Ch B. This page has instructions:
No, in the channel “B” the true form of a signal is shown. It is checked for 100 % a serviceable oscillograph. It is a signal on the power unit of the amplifier (the enclosed file) in the points noted red. Many thanks for the reference, I will try according to your recommendation and I will report about results.
Don’t know why nobody notice this dramatic bug. There are tremendous timing mismatches between analog and digital channels in all firmwares.
Yes it is, thank you, but still no any efforts from developers side…
Yes it is, thank you, but still no any efforts from developers side…
Heh, in the past 9 months, never has Seeed or eDesign co. fixed a single bug properly. There have been some updates, but the horrible triggering bugs and malfunctioning calibration remain as ever.
If there is hope… it lies in the community.
Legally speaking a product does not meet the specs. BTW, this is the cause for termination of sales according to the Law.
Legally speaking a product does not meet the specs. BTW, this is the cause for termination of sales according to the Law.
Hehe, surprisingly I wouldn’t return the device even if I could. As a portable oscilloscope, with all its defiencies, it’s still the best one I’ve ever owned. The typical 10 MSps multimeter-style devices with grayscale screens and no programs are nothing compared to the Quad.