Hi there,
SO , I see this is the Latest Test data in from The Vikings’
Radio Section Updates.
Bluetooth LE
Scenario | nRF54L15/10/05 | nRF52840 |
---|---|---|
Bluetooth LE TX 1 Mbps +8 dBm | 9.8 mA | 16.4 mA |
Bluetooth LE TX 1 Mbps 0 dBm | 4.8 mA | 6.4 mA |
Bluetooth LE RX 1 Mbps | 3.4 mA | 6.4 mA |
Advertising 30ms | 122.81 µA | 164.03 µA |
Advertising 200ms | 24.22 µA | 30.48 µA |
Advertising 2000ms | 5.14 µA | 5.89 µA |
Connected 0 data | 14.44 µA | 19.25 µA |
Connected ~50kB/s | 1.45 mA | 1.87 mA |
Connected ~100kB/s | 2.91 mA | 3.69 mA |
Connected ~150kB/s | 4.33 mA | 5.51 mA |
Connected Max | 4.98 mA | 6.36 mA |
Advertising: A beacon with device name, no other data, no scan response
Connected: Peripheral Nordic UART service
Processing efficiency: Solving 1M quadratic equations, looping every 2 seconds.
Thread (802.15.4)
Let’s take a look at the average sleep current for the two devices running Thread 1.4, in two different scenarios:
Scenario | nRF54L15/10/05 | nRF52840 |
---|---|---|
Sleepy End Device TX 0 dBm with 1-second polling period | 2.75 μA | 3.56 μA |
Synchronized Sleepy End Device with 1-second CSL period | 2.75 μA | 3.58 μA |
The nRF54L Series has approximately 23% less average sleep current than the nRF52840 SoC.
See the Power consumption data for the total charge per minute and the average data poll charge.
Good stuff and strong effort to bring true Battery powered BLE as a standard.
HTH
GL PJ