Thanks for the response. I’m actually doing savgol filters when I plot. The data rate for the MR60BHA2 is much higher than the Respiration Belt, so I’ve tried adjusting for that. I would not classify the respiration belt as industry-standard, I would say its more like an educational market device. It’s not a medical device and also it was extremely uncomfortable so I modified the elastic belt. I just wanted to make sure that it wasn’t a known limitation that the device limited to the “normal range” of 12 to 20. For my purposes I’m actually more interested in the relative rates and how it compares to other sensor data. I’ll probably just do some longer (30 minute) measurements with just counting my breaths 10 at a time and to some simple calibration as well as trying to log the phase data as well. The MR60BHA2 is obviously way more comfortable than even my modified respiration belt so as long as I get a consistent measurement it is probably a better solution for me. One other note is when I’m measuring I’m sitting up without a seat back, actually sitting on the floor so I might be swaying a bit. I’m logging the distance data so I can look at that as well. Thanks again for the response.
1 Like